To know you cant

---

He wasn't polite or even family happened.   He considered it her own right.   When fuel cut low who paid.   When the meal ticket wasn't covered who triple paid.   Who was from saving and work, to do good rounded out debt of 200k plus the reputation of him being true, left a denial with that.    They have to overcome and won't happen to admit it for own best impact or better for it actually occured.   If handicapped, to any "retard" swear for casual even, Then explanation for that debt or time to well disregard it, it's for his own advancement, wasn't true to even the decade of time, that went, for his own future good kept all of that a classified for his own determination of other people's lives, it meant senate fit that.

About it, the year took to grip that ones life, wasn't two to three.   He was non stop there with he claimed to teach politics, well it didn't happen, and he had to take a break to make a cover for his long time at anothers cost.   That was how to campaign, to be a cover to that time, and failed to disclose campaign efforts to who he returned and it was a subject  again, but who couldn't have helped with true genuine campaign efforts?    With that as a genuine true point for all the cost?   No way, the campaign told and spoke about how he genuine was it that, nothing else at all going but true to help that one to submit to a lie and make a cover for it him, to ask them, went back to the debt and lack of available to contact, or even show any relation to what could have been a work letter of recommendation, for any actual proof to benefit the subjects own life, went back to campaign will cover up that time cost or even it relates 

Romney went don't.    He made someone pay for the dog, swore the dog wasn't his, it was who bought it, then demanded the dog back, full of smoke inhalation for his own life preference for the dog, ironic to who owned it he still used his own way of life perhaps, for the dogs injuries,  and wanted it back wasn't true it was demanded for that back yes without the original cost to buy what wasn't even advertised as his own dog

He was entering houses without home owner permission, but just to walk through not at all without asking home owner first, it was to keep up with what work, it won't even show for public record.   He entered three, with no home owner to know

He was blindsided by this woman wouldn't be a true work or task about the USA mix up even for that government.  That entailed it is about true, 

monitoring yes a woman but yes not his own kind to relate, in shower, he has records of about 23 of the 28 perhaps times for yes true one non related single woman that were not for the woman to hear about or for her to realize the notes are actually there.   There was some film for most of that.  It wasn't pardoned or blamed for the fact went under a gross turn of events where his staff support assaults the female surrounding their control of that occured with assaults comes medical records and a few    This did he order or intend?   The truth may not happen it reference not, but the better half or best half for political figures would be honest efforts to combat that behavior even if elected or if it relates,  reduces the order based on it wasn't done, the honest part to combat just that, while the officers felt it related, they were true not him.   The extensive injuries were not accepted but the order question, went to reduce to awareness for even in event such brutality from domestic law officers would not be combatted if it related as many of them who were being brutal to the woman, claimed they felt.   Again because the honest part didn't happen full face forward, would the act happen for the public to know and voice about it?    It failed to assume awareness means to check back for the responsibility of oversight committee he is a candidate perhaps he won't have to oversee that responsibility until complete 

He wasn't playing with USA government funds, he was controlling who was using the government funds for a party or used for events that were not disclosed for public to know where their tax dollars went.   Four events are sold from a decade ago no longer, but may he use that same discretion for the states budget wasn't a party to them, that's a real budget now to handle it   it contradicts where the four or a few parties wasn't from him being in office and happened before    They were both public funds.   The discretion claimed to play with it, was alright.

If he wasnt in one event personal, in a far different state, then Florida, but used technology to keep an eye from out of state, why send his own campaign to collect his own celeb agenda.  It misconstrued him as being actually in the legal presence of where to focus for his own campaign agenda, about someone else, and took advantage for he didn't travel.  So what?  The actual event took 100000 from the civilians but benefits his own campaign when he was coordinating his private life, which wasn't for the civilians who lost income even, for the actual hype probably took 2 million of tax dollars and no one knows that.   The 100000 was just one person beyond the public economic impact, which the declaration of non disclosure for that actual event, was so huge, the campaign trail could cover that too, it loops back up to the top for that one, it wasn't, someone else's