To Create a 2nd only me, for help

---

There was no free choice for this a woman who will not be but broken from saying anything.   If she loved her own way, it's not 

They don't have a leader.   What doubles did chaos in the USA own government system itself  will not have a leader to equal count a woman who has another experience even which isn't allowed and makes eight logic even sense for its said and talk from who did wrong, as the original portrayal about the doubles of them political figures to reflect how seriously wrong and bad, but that reflection won't make the tv, which should be to help themselves    Leaving an individual without an option for a fact won't get true to the media who may view change the subject and see who did wrong going well and even strong points    See that's how USA government isn't to that one, won't get said.   We believe she sisnt have a free choice, won't get a question if that's even true?  No leader would initiate that about their own lead?   The moral weight of covering up , did that happen for a talk to the woman victim or even subject for that, won't morals be subtracted from a political agenda for personal relational issues which did not at all truly consider the victim before it's own, or equal value for what happened not really being an unequal swear to avoid, really being just the double used the political figure to have the same woman figure it out in their own was that the same concept for public drugs, weighs in as yes.   Go figure won't be that or said.   It's possible unliked 

 They used a double, a twin, perhaps to who the toss subjects are not it.  She didn't know who or why the USA own government a failed concept about their own time administration, wouldn't even relay for it as past, it had failed, and they were key.  They were basically playing the real leader, that one who , it may have been them even, but took it wasn't twelve days without talk, and encouraged it, for all it wasn't even an occurrence, which should be explained to that?  But the actual political figure kept the same civilian woman, below some directly related people, which to not inform just that one it wasnt him was actual, they kept a fight to account the same a woman, more silent which may, not , but was this ordered?   This is a true story.  Some graphic when details won't get to talk, the actual story wasn't even suggested to say or tell, it went polar to extreme to harm even to maintain the silence for it, did the evidence gathered help defend?   Is yes yet it wasn't honest will not subdue to be excess effort to undermine for her, their hindrance to encourage it honest from her or even for their explanation, which avoids blame for her, to need it

 The actual woman had extreme effort and work to get out or away from who was hurting her.   The simple word, they were not reflects political chaos from up towards down no, that's her.  It was only displaced.   The use of political figure doubles for security would be to hit them before a political figure     If she is crying and pleading about what happened, to maintain what happened as right, won't show equal true to USA law.   She hadn't slept in a week?  No, then an asking session who won't get that done, for the actual work night impact political figures as the portrayal simply suggested, took the actions a mis match to the words own value to continue to relate what, after that.  Upset or not, she was not aware that public office may, not come out with what they do, and didn't think that was right or a honest way for political figures to be.

Running a racket or ring.    What the actual doubles did was run rackets.     The media portray if this actual at all even ever happening, didn't occur, another let down for but the same actual behavior could confront from the doubles own advantage being best stage for the press or media for their best interest based on the continued efforts towards silence from that happened 

What media could have done to exaggerate public tax dollars , still won't be how to do the news wouldn't get stated to the media , it kept a grip on their story as if who eid wring set a bar for how to approach , but being free, it will not be but reflective of its government orientation reflecting self agenda for own delight for the scenario to go there, which won't need news for a fact

If facts aren't gathered but true to disappear from them the media , well who is in charge or the leader to tax paid employees who could have fabricated with effort to extreme to silence outside of their hold over what occured    To have a political agenda to prototype or even believe  that they might role play perhaps for a double role route won't be true to assess for any media who won't question that authority isn't true, but received yes yet it's underplayed true to any leadership for same route to attune with just the influence

 To misuse sexual permission, it didn't happen overnight   What actual will or won't have it, self indulgence for their world ruler.    Half of the staff, aware of him enough to 

Were eating sexual drugs that induce mind body even mood altercations as apart of it, a display of the substances to the world and portray themselves as if playing meant to go with it, any experimentation, was how two leads were updated, and took words without asking if they were drug induced, which was true their authority and jurisdiction, as leadership but went it's tough topic no, avoided but under guidance    This did not overlap with other leaders and know political figures are leaders.  This took a short time, they themselves were each voluntarily given it to both disperse and own enjoyment over about three months, but did have impact on update    It wasn't just about them, who do they disperse it to?  It had well who to update one who didn't use it wasn't assessed, it was who wanted the political figure to do as they like reflective perhaps about a day old when it would not be who had done originating wrong to be who requires punishment had risk of any victim for self blame who will not have concern and who they themselves can go forward for own free choice even for their own career but that this wasn't allowed for who didn't do anything so bad or wrong to (considered alternative punishment use to rationalize maintaining it's standard, but yes this is USA own federal government but political figure some may relate was who went to subject status ) deserve it. 

 Wasnt for the todays drug dispersement.   Yes, it's two locations so what, people from public     will     not       Have it.          Just simply the truth about own very public use, can't get true to say the words t.ut will be what took place even today, pre warn words are a no, but to do it public access and even blind to alert, but isolated to two locations for the drugs being the definition to alter, may not be for elevation, medications for example, have disclosures but won't be needed for all    This may as the government has the open access from them the store to blame even if caught, won't be true for they have that for official.   It's sort of from an event to illegalize but when the illegal aspect didn't happen the same group who vouched kept really using it.  The attempt to illegalize it it failed so they know it might be for them to show off they make them, or even other uses are why.   Why is it literal    If receipts are kept when they will come out, an opportunity to true lawsuit, will happen, but it's maintained today well the care was so low, as if allowed , which won't impede other avenues which won't be any concern for a seperate route of them