Site Content

---

To get approval to promote yourself, yes its true romney sure wont have any confrontation, for moral standard for it.  That wasn't the only one.   Well let him  name them he won't moral patrol it, well no that's going on.  He is the main star, it's an event.   Where did it go?    To say Romney hosted an event like that it's slander to well ""the it"" the overall weight of the federal end, it was just to protect was but the political involvement own history of it, is how that one prayed or played out.  The simple pray reference intended for he was making it.    He's so good.   Family oriented.      Now see who caught that benefit.   To take a role to lead that one event wasn't that.  

To endorse really said it.  Still top as if won.  It was technical true those, their kind, why allow, with own past about event, the no control wait.    He knows whats gling on in true for real that will land it.    To know what will land for own way, now what does the media do?   The simple process question, won't promote the baby step to reach him , said WONT, it may show where event leaders were not but to account any perk, for his own notations as a past life, will show who was or wasn't leading such event.   But to really value just the PR way to show how reality moved on, subjects the subject's who were not usa government or even political heads, to the downfall as any government perk had to come from somewhere or even someone very simple.   To have experienced is to deny to keep up with a previous leader to even say it have said it, meant physical harm. Which includes five years of detainment , knocked unconscious, and much more, just to swear that they any true figure for all the rest see weight for own value which is a concept about what was displaced which isn't reflected in tongue 

To mandate regular promotions , isn't true how to well get the press for focus as it may sway how to win.   What the political heads did was a civilian life who reaped the cost?    For three years, had some extended, couldn't get managed as if that first event created a norm to get media to go well free for it, its an event took two more chances to co-op or even utilize 

The extreme use of media to handle the later it never happened,  wasnt but the course.  The actual occurance of that event meant to encourage even private large businesses, former actors and actresses,  and more people, to fill a political figures own weight, for true value if they are who 

It was mass volume, on a civilian cost, but the usa gov full benefit, partial for the course took to divert only the civilian subjects reality, well took that too.  What the use of media did .... was worth escape from leader roles, as others managed , not them who might for their branches, well that took too long.   Make sure today's reality is right from any past won't get said from it.   No one from extreme volume can formulate?   Not really why, it's like grabbing someone to go ""do it"" meant press moment for form.   If that went to prep for weeks before, the common memory, to prep in advance but didn't require to do in the moment press or media.  Now recollect that moment, not own home life and some may happen to have trouble too.   It won't show.   The challenge who won't bypass government as good for concept, mean to comply a little 

It wasn't for the civilians maybe 6, involved in the media extreme events, if two tried to exit, and it wouldn't matter.     The zero free choice wouldn't reflect what anticipated result of pro agenda for any private market or even political advancements.   The means of the civilians or subjects to then, an older event for todays time, was to move forward, sustain volume, and silence from matter the civilians who really did reap cost for such benefits " to go other way. "  ""To go other way"" that one won't admit it the benefit or event ever even, the event which wasn't managed from normal rank or standard rank, which is in legal materials for its known in just the USA government yes, left unknown, the overall plot was to get away with it some.   It left a gap for them to move forward, and even literal.   This is true for the civilian subjects?   Not at all, a party.   The term event would suggest a party form of accumulation, with major or extreme to the language of media , which is the use of the term event as opposed to party, which describes, the media involvement.    Can a person leave the media?    To use it, to overlap, yes it was used.    Why didn't they cover or host "event"   It's why to come outside.   Now really relate with their own standard to detain , no its not what did it, usually not recalled to peg that one and get the picture, its for truth that's all, it took a minute, their focus could have even felt violsted.   Well it's to come out for.  The usa government grip, around it was extreme, but why they came out.  To use them to manage detainment , some, was sort of just one means to let go, of supervision even, "for that what's going on"" which wasn't genuine like for a true party timeline.   The lack of supervision left due complain process way below, with no option to quit, it just blew on to the next day but left refusal behind for the day before already moving forward left that rejection back, for central task 

The Hollywood perks ir even media good view.    To have the "event" subject trashed public stammered. Even embarrassed a little?   No way it had to be extreme, even let kids smeer them but like for hurt.   It meant to use media to devalue any word from civilian subjects .   Can a pastor reap other benefits?   From just that?   Should a political figures be the hero to the subject's media in such harm form?   Of course all that bad to the civilian subjects had to swear in the good ones for well they could just reap perks. It kept it going.   The bad one is the looser for the show used extreme even real life to show it wasnt even to play a bad anything, took all that from subjects real life.   A lot of people got benefits out of that.   Morals wasn't the Hollywood concept

There are no actual routes to confirm for just 6 people?  Well key to thise direct under smeer, some let usa government or why private market cant quit, its a government liason to them, just thise few civilians. Yes civilians who can not show that took place being now?   Do long before when?