It wasnt true

---

it for equal all parties involved, even true personal life issues.  You can't blame them who took the route to explain sexuality to those youth who just reside in one if the areas of another hosted political figure parrty event for sexual......     THAT parties point that political figures point, the another civilian subject, well they made it a decade with zero talk from that usa government, but to the decade old actual true occurance even literal , the political figures were supposed to get blamed, but see the TV, they are all moving forward from the media and well see , that screwball crazy insane, is trying to accuse that PR of sexual, when it was just doubles of the true political figures.    So where is it, the party, for the communities own kids to really out view all that occured to be a party even sexual?  The civilians of the locations might have had open access to sexual supplies or felt sexual in that time.   2016.     So this was not usa but still, the real political figures couldn't get blamed.    That still wasn't the party part.   If they report and keep record if their own report, from that time, it may have happened.     Why silence that civilian or It was just to do it.  You may not blame, that one, for social influence.   OK subjects in hold won't.  They were facing prison. While sworn under usa federal employment.   Maybe they didn't do it.   Would political orders , create that as ok standard?      No.    

It wasn't that the sexual industry really needed to go up overseas also.   There were reasons again to show a flow of leadership not really.   There were sexual depictions for her one child from another country?   Maybe, probably not like usa.   The probable promotes party for random behavior so to depict it would be underwater or under notated for exposure to sexual 

Again this is a decade old almost

How explanations occured or still don't, reflects isoalted behavior for notation from that very old true now. Just that time, a lot of civilian explanations were not there 

it for equal all parties involved, even true personal life issues.  You can't blame them who took the route to explain sexuality to those youth who just reside in one if the areas of another hosted political figure parrty event for sexual...... maybe it wasn't that political who did it, see it counters from one simple usa civilian.   To create a hush, for risk of international relationships,  seemed to help  any international relations, swayed by their own people, to silence no.    To inform and explain who Introduced that to their own people, no too.    This creates an air of relationship to surround silence. And secondaries what could be a natural dispute.   But to build relationships politically with no sound regard for them, will not help allies strengthen or empower, usa government old objective went down a lot.  But true know the fresh , past absent, even just to look good, and relate moving forward went how civilian subjects couldnt for impact to silence meant below government control, reflected from party with full management for all at all times, no, the control weight went to support move forward and political figures best interest as government should work, wouldn't be assessed

Do not let the media handle it took such huge embarrassment risk.    If the media was took, to one side for control effort, it will show, they didn't have one so forward and even everything was right, even put own effort to yell and even shout for that one.   To hold news free of obstruction, wasn't allowed.   Again very old 2016

If youth do share their own sexual if any or if at all, with a parent, the topic might have been missed for lack of explanation,  real risk perhaps for the communication hazard or standard for private home.   This runs alongside media portrayals all of them, political figures are who are so gold, even good creating that standard from homes where they might have just had that for regular exposure ?   Maybe it went to party for extreme exposure left free choice from a few individuals to manage , perhaps the kickback at home for residents wouldn't

It wasn't good planning should reflect financial path to host such party specific to 2016.   Well where would it be to go attend some , it wouldn't get discussed, refluxed, personal home discussion from explanations who might not have had a free choice about attending they were residents of just that one area